Filed under Enterprise 2.0

Gamification: The Key to Reducing Burnout in Call Centers

Gamification is one of those areas I am very interested in and I posted a cool infographic earlier on this blog. Very recently, I was contacted by Lauren Carlson from Software Advice about gamification of the call center. She writes about various topics related to CRM software, with particular interest in sales force automation, marketing automation, and customer service. She has written a great article on how we could gamify the call center and prevent agent burnout. Lauren was kind to write up a quick summary of her ideas for the readers of this blog. I am sure you would enjoy the idea and do share your comments about it.

Within the enterprise, gamification – the process of adding gaming elements to a non-gaming activity to encourage action and participation – has gone from being a faux pas to an accepted growing trend. Currently, many software vendors are experimenting by adding gaming elements to their software. I decided to do some experimenting of my own, focusing on help desk software.

The support team environment is a rigorous and demanding one where there is high turnover due to support agents getting burned out. But what if you added gaming elements to help desk software in such a way that helped boost employee retention by providing agents with a greater sense of accomplishment? If they felt like they were “winning,” perhaps agents would be more motivated in their daily activities.

Going off this premise, I focused on a few of the main activities support agents engage in each day (ticket resolutions, customer relations, training) and added some gaming element to it. I made some sketches of what the UI’s of a “gamified” help desk system might look like. Check them out below.

1. Accomplishment metrics

Three of the most important metrics to support agents are number of ticket resolutions, number of “quick” ticket resolutions and positive customer feedback. In this UI, you can see that those three metrics are tracked visibly across the top of the agent’s dashboard. The numbers increase as the day goes on, allowing the agent to see their progress and accomplishments in real time. Additionally, these metrics are variable, depending on the organization. For example, a “quick” resolution could be one that happens in 30 minutes or less.

2. Leaderboards

Based on those metrics, you could create leaderboards, allowing agents to see how they are measuring up again their peers. You will notice the added “Score” column. Again, this is a variable metric, depending on how your organization weights the three individual metrics.

You could do the same with a team leaderboard, comparing parallel support teams within your organization.

3. Training:

One of the biggest issues support team managers have is onboarding new agents in a timely manner. By gamifying the training process, you could ensure a quick onboarding process, while making it fun for the new agent.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Change & Communications Study Report: Implications For Asia Pacific

Towers Watson (my employer) recently released a report on The 2011/12 Change & Communication ROI Study report. It has great insights about what could organizations do to build Clarity, Confidence and Community in their organizations through effective communications and change management. While I leave you to enjoy the full report, I found some of the charts interesting as they showed geographical breakdowns including Asia-Pacific level data.

In terms of ensuring that employees are business literate and have a good view of organizational performance, there seems to be little variation across the geographical regions. Even so, Asia-Pacific sits at the bottom of the pack on these important issues related to providing clarity and building a sense of connection.

The second issue I spotted was related to Employee Value Proposition (EVP). Given the nature of the talent race in Asia, I think it’s quite a hot issues these days. And interestingly, a higher percentage of Asia-Pacific companies report that they have a clearly defined EVP. However, when it comes to having a segmented EVP approach (e.g. for high performers, high potentials etc.), these companies fare a bit badly. Also, the bigger question is how effectively is the EVP winning mind-share in the talent market.

And as social media powers the new world of communications, there is a fair distance that companies in Asia-Pacific have to go. Only about 30% of the organizations report that they have a documented social media policy in place, the corresponding number for the USA is 77%! Moreover, only a handful of Asia-Pacific companies report that they have the right tools to measure the effectiveness of social media. So, first there is an adoption issue and then, if measurement is not effective, then establishing a clear business case for social media will be a challenge for companies. As for me, I am more interested in finding out how Asia Pacific companies are leveraging these channels for building an open, transparent and collaborative workplace.

All graphs and data credits to Towers Watson
Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Gamification of the Enterprise

One of the blogs I love reading is The Future Of Work blog by Socialcast. It has great content about things I am passionate about – social media, organization development, employee engagement, collaboration tools etc. They also put up great infographics every now and then. I just couldn’t resist posting their infographic titled “Adding Play Into the Enterprise”. It does a crisp summary of employee engagement trends, the explosion of gaming and how they can be married together. My favorite bit is when they compare the ‘Gaming World’ with the ‘Job World’. So, your job title is the “level”, salary is “score”, promotions are “level up” and performance reviews are the “stat summary”. That’s a cool way to think about it!

Enjoy the infographic! And do share your best ideas on gamification.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

How Can Enterprise and Consumer Technologies Co-exist?

A group of Accenture executives have put together an interesting piece in BusineWeek titled “When the iPad is the Only Computer Your Employees Need – Or Want”. The authors mention the excitement surrounding consumer technologies, which is completely absent in the case of enterprise technologies.

Why is enterprise technology—the kind your employer has always provided—being eclipsed by products your kids use? To begin with, consumer technologies are more fun, more intuitive—and better for what people actually want to do. Facebook and Twitter, for example, provide a broader form of connectedness than e-mail. Microsoft and Google’s mapping services keep adding higher resolution and more relevant information. YouTube has blasted a crater-size hole in the bulwark of broadcast media, and users upload about 24 hours’ worth of videos to it every minute. When was the last time an enterprise application created so much excitement that its growth could be measured every 60 seconds?

I have always felt appalled at the sorry state and the cumbersomeness of our “work” software (see here and here). Instead of “enabling” people, they often eat up a lot of productive time to accomplish minor administrative tasks. As a result, several people bring their own solutions to the situation. They start using consumer cloud storage to create backup of data, in case the VPN isn’t working from outside office, they connect with prospects over social networks, search for critical information on their self-paid smartphones, read company articles on tablet devices – the list goes on. The authors write:

With all that’s happening, it’s easy to imagine a world, five years from now, where the ninth generation of Apple’s iPhone is many employees’ primary computer, and where the time that employees spend on enterprise systems is measured in minutes per day, not hours.

There is a hint of freedom in this view of the future—a secret thrill in having a way, finally, to escape the shackles of corporate technology policy. However, from a business standpoint, the presence of consumer technologies in the enterprise, and the increasing inclination of workers to “go rogue,” are not unqualified pluses—by a long shot. These technologies create real risks around data security, scalability, cost management, and data governance. They complicate operations for the many big companies that still make extensive use of legacy systems.

And they then go on to exist how these two technologies can co-exist.

1. Make decisions based on facts, not conjecture. Don’t guess at the impact consumer technologies are having. Ask your people, for starters, but be sure to distinguish between their use of consumer technology on company time and their use of it to do company work.

2. End the blanket ban on Internet services. Employees are pretty much ignoring these bans on Gmail, Facebook, Twitter, and the like anyway. Look for ways to take advantage of these services in the workplace.

3. Embrace consumer applications as a recruitment tool. Some companies already use their support for open systems and Apple products to impress their flexibility upon job candidates.

4. Get out in front of the trend. Employees are already spending their own money on technology that benefits their employers. Pick a group, set some ground rules for a category of technology (smartphones, say), set a per-person budget, and see how people do with it.

5. Accept the inevitable. More company data will reside in the cloud, so update your IT and data policies accordingly.

Bottom line: Every company will have to explore ways to make use of the consumer technology revolution. The big strategic technology issue for the next decade will be how business leaders, CIOs, and IT departments adjust to a world that has gone in a new direction—that has gone a little rogue—and is not coming back.

It’s high time we re-think the way things get done, the way software powers businesses and people. One can intuitively think of the substantial productivity gains for the enterprise as a result. And for employees, it’s one more step towards the ideal enterprise.

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Breaking The Information Barrier In Companies

There are various areas in which organizations need to reinvent the way of doing things. But, to me, one of the most worrisome issues is the issue of rigid hierarchies, control mechanisms and collaboration. I believe these are critical barriers to maximizing enterprise performance.

Often I find that “information” is the key. It is one of the most powerful sources of individual competitive advantages in an organizational context. In most cases, we find that the higher  you are in the hierarchy, the more information you have. Authority is the mirror image of the information one has. In a way, how much should you know is dependent on where you sit across a range of job grades! And, we are not just talking about sensitive information like detailed financials or diversity reports (though I don’t feel these are sensitive!). We are talking the essentials – information about product / services, procedures, systems, repository of innovative ideas, best practices, customer insights or even people – as to who specializes in what or who is the “go-to” person for a particular issue. And, all this information is usually sitting pretty somewhere “up” there! Far away from people, who might need it the most!

If this issue is unchecked, often I see cases of “information hoarding”. As humans, we like to “own” things – put a seal on them – “mine”! It appears we sometimes do the same with information. Especially, when organization structures / practices / culture does not place enough emphasis (I am not talking about mere lip service) on sharing. Worst of all, the whole system sometimes ends up rewarding the ones who hoard information. After all, information is power and one can succeed with the right information. So, that becomes the norm. The message is out. “Hold on to the information. You are better off keeping it to yourself, rather than sharing it with everyone. You can get things done. Win that big bonus. Become a star. And you can outpace others in office.”

What does this lead to? Sooner, rather than later – poor enterprise performance. Let me give some examples, which you might be able to relate to:

  • You call your bank’s phone-banking line because you have a wrong transaction in your account – nothing very major. The phone-banking rep puts you on hold to look into the manual on how to address the problem. Doesn’t find the right information and transfers your call to the “relevant” department. Again, no resolution. Looks like something is missing in the manual. Or maybe, some one sat there up in the corner office and designed it without knowing the ground realities. Finally, the call is transferred to the “manager”, who is able to reverse the transaction and closes out the issue. You look at your watch and realize that was 20 minutes of your time for a $10 transaction!
  • You are attending an exhibition where companies are demonstrating some fancy manufacturing machinery. It’s a big event. You set your eyes on a piece of work, and you reckon it can improve your plant’s productivity by 10-15%. But, you are worried about energy consumption and ask the company’s reps “I know this machinery can be customized to a customer’s needs. Which specific components are most customizable from the point of reducing energy consumption, while maintaining productivity?” The rep looks at you, looks at his colleagues. Smiles. “I will have to get back to you.” Wonders to himself “Boss knows!”. And, you move on to talk to some of the other stalls at the exhibition.
  • A customer calls you and asks you to come over to make a sales pitch on a specific subject, say business continuity services. Given the customer’s industry, you know that your colleague in another team had made a similar pitch a few years back. You go to her, ask for some materials that you can re-use. She says, “I am a bit busy. Getting on a plane soon. Will try to send something in the next 1 week”. Oh! The customer wanted the presentation tomorrow. And you get back to your desk and spend the rest of the day (and part of the night) in re-inventing something that already exists in a fine form. Talk about putting in productive hours at work!

The list is endless. And, the potential for productivity gains by addressing this area is endless too. I feel very passionately for this issue, since I have seen hundreds of people, including myself, being affected by this. And even more so, because now we really seem to have enabling technology to support information sharing like never before. And that is a very important development. But, technology in itself can never ever be the ultimate solution. It’s a tool, not an outcome. More importantly, it will have to be about imbibing the value of sharing, building a culture which supports and disproportionately rewards “information disseminators”.

We need to free up information. What has been your experience? How can we hack companies’ management practices and liberate the information to reach where it truly belongs – the people? How can we bust these islands of information? How can we build this component of “the ideal enterprise”. How can we do that? Tell me now!

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers